LePage, sportsmen’s group tussle over $40 million fish hatchery

Sep. 27—Republican gubernatorial candidate Paul LePage says he misplaced the political assist of a strong statewide fish and sport group as a result of he refused to vow that Maine would fund building of a $40 million fish hatchery in 2023.

The Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine Institute for Legislative Motion has recognized building of a brand new hatchery as a prime political precedence. Three of the 22 questions it included in its 2022 political questionnaire used to evaluate Maine candidates had been concerning the hatchery.

LePage mentioned Monday that he helps the thought, and believes the following governor will discover a place for it in a future finances, however mentioned he could not decide to it till he reviewed the small print of a hatchery plan and think about the way it matches into the state’s total budgeting priorities.

“They stored pushing and pushing,” LePage mentioned Monday throughout a telephone interview concerning the alliance’s candidate evaluation course of. “I mentioned wait a minute. They simply need cash. So I referred to as them up and mentioned pull my survey. I do not need to be concerned. I am unable to be purchased.”

Consequently, the alliance gave LePage an incomplete grade in its 2022 election information, saying it lacked the knowledge it wanted to grade him after he determined to withdraw his questionnaire. It gave incumbent Democratic Gov. Janet Mills an A score and a thumbs up.

David Trahan, the alliance’s govt director and a logger and former state senator from Maine’s twentieth district, mentioned on Monday that there is no such thing as a quid professional quo expectations of candidates. He mentioned the alliance’s board stands by the grades awarded in its legislative information.

“We thought the interview was cordial and respectful,” Trahan mentioned. “We shared our issues with Gov. LePage, as we do with all our candidates. All our points. We had been respectful. We by no means put strain on any candidate.”

The alliance is a strong lobbying group on the State Home that charges candidates for the U.S Congress, Blaine Home and state Legislature based mostly on their responses to a questionnaire. It has formally endorsed candidates prior to now, however mentioned it doesn’t plan to take action this yr.

The alliance says a brand new hatchery with a state-of-the-art filtration system is required to lift sufficient fish to inventory Maine’s rivers and lakes, and meet decrease phosphorous discharge requirements which might be looming sooner or later.

The group’s hatchery committee tasks that renovating Maine’s present hatcheries to fulfill the brand new phosphorous requirements may value $150 million to $200 million and should require the state to scale back fish manufacturing. In its election information, the alliance says it will be “far less expensive to construct a brand new hatchery for $40 million.”

Mills, in her questionnaire, mentioned she supported building of a brand new hatchery and supported each a bond of as much as $20 million and use of common funds to construct it. As an avid angler, she mentioned she understands the financial impression that angling has on Maine’s economic system.

“I strongly assist increasing Maine’s hatchery system,” Mills wrote. “I plan to work with SAM, the legislature, and (Division of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife) to look at all accessible choices and decide whether or not borrowing or a common fund appropriation is a greater possibility.”

LePage accused Mills of promoting out to curry the alliance’s favor and purchase its members’ votes.

“If my opponent desires to vow you $40 million, go to her, she’s already attempting to purchase the election with the $850 checks,” LePage mentioned, referring to Mills’ inflation reduction funds to Maine taxpayers. “I am unable to do something about that, however that does not imply I’ve received to surrender my rules.”


Trahan mentioned that he’s calling an emergency assembly of the board of administrators on Tuesday to reply to a sequence of tweets by LePage on Monday morning that claimed the alliance needed him to vow them $40 million {dollars} for a undertaking to get a greater grade on their survey.

“In contrast to Janet Mills, I don’t make finances guarantees throughout marketing campaign season to curry favor and purchase votes,” LePage tweeted. “Maine’s sportsmen and girls know they will belief me to defend their rights. I do not purchase endorsements or assist by making guarantees.”

The Mills marketing campaign, reached late Monday afternoon, had no remark about LePage’s claims. Final week, Mills issued a written assertion about her prime score with the alliance, saying the outside is central to Maine’s economic system and its folks.

“I’ve fought laborious to be sure that we’re preserving and defending our lands, creating extra alternatives for searching, fishing, and ATVing, and — most significantly — ensuring that future generations will be capable to take pleasure in our state in the identical manner we do right now,” Mills mentioned.

In its election information, the alliance started its rationalization of its A score for Mills by noting that she had reached out after she was elected in 2018 although it had endorsed her opponent, Shawn Moody, after which labored with the alliance to mood proposed gun management laws.

The group famous that Mills supported Maine’s “yellow flag” regulation, which permits police to confiscate weapons from somebody who’s deemed to be a menace to themselves or others. The alliance supported that invoice, which requires a medical evaluation.

Mills additionally indicated she would oppose a spread of gun restrictions, together with requiring a license to buy ammunition, elevating the age to buy ammo from 18 to 21, requiring background checks for third-party gun gross sales and banning high-capacity ammunition magazines.

LePage, who has A+ scores from the Nationwide Rifle Affiliation and Gun Homeowners of America, probably would have fared effectively on this a part of the questionnaire and report test, too, however the group agreed to maintain the outcomes of LePage’s incomplete questionnaire confidential.


LePage probably would have answered otherwise than Mills in not less than one different a part of the questionnaire that’s vital to the alliance — open area conservation packages that shield vital fish and sport habitat, particularly the Land for Maine’s Future program and deer yard purchases.

Mills helps many conservation packages. LePage mentioned that he helps them, however provided that they do not rely an excessive amount of on federal funding, and thus rising the nationwide debt, or take the open area off native tax rolls, which he says unfairly shifts a municipality’s tax burden to seniors.

In 2015, he held up $2 million in voter-approved LMF bonds, along with greater than $11 million in LMF bonds from earlier years. On the time, he acknowledged he was searching for leverage to extend timber harvesting on state lands. He launched the bonds later that yr.

On Monday, LePage mentioned he wasn’t too frightened concerning the incomplete grade from the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine.

“Let’s put it this fashion, the NRA has 100,000 members in Maine and SAM’s received 7,000,” LePage mentioned. “If I lose the election by a vote, then it had an impression. However look, my feeling is my precept is extra vital than shopping for the election. The finances is extra vital.”

The alliance additionally gave an incomplete grade to unbiased Sam Hunkler, a doctor from Beals who would be the third candidate on the November poll for governor. On his web site, Hunkler mentioned Maine should preserve its pure areas, however does not take a place on conservation packages.